OLDFall 2022 Law School Course Evaluations

What aspect(s) of the course or instruction could be improved? require this class--larger pool of students

Inclusion of Presenter was extremely insightful and brought a realistic perspective of A2J issues however more of an introduction to the topic prior to the presentation would allow for more developed dialog. I would have liked to write more for class. It was rare for Prof. Johnson to respond to my emails. The syllabus said work that is worthy of an ' A ' gets an "A ' . I don ' t know what this means when none of my emails are answered and i ' ve gotten zero feedback on any work I ' ve submitted/presentations given in class. While a final presentation worth a huge part of our grade was in the syllabus, no info was given on the project until the week before it was due--which really puts a burden on evening students who had to develop an entire presentation over the two-day weekend. I would have preferred to have a semester-long project with class meetings to provide update on research and ideas and get feedback from our peers on their suggestions. Also, If I ' m paying for a two-hour class, then class can go two hours. Class ended after 1 hour 75% of the time. Only thing I can think of is that I wish the class was larger, so more people could be involved in our discussions, but that is obviously not controlled by the professor. The class was a bit disorganized. The announcements at the end of class for what would be covered next class was often wrong (at least at the beginning of the semester). What was due for assignments was often confusing or unclear as we did not alway follow the syllabus. While I enjoyed the class alot, Ms. Johnson could improve in her directions. In the final I felt lost, and so did my other peers. We all emailed her for more clarity and did not receive a response back. Again I understand that Ms. Johnson is busy but it made the final confusing. Overall I thought professor Johnson did great with this course, no changes.

8