Suffolk Law: Fall 2016 Course Evaluations

SCHOOL: Suffolk Law School Fall 2016 COURSE: 7285 LAW 2398 AE ADV SVY _ CORE LEG PRI INSTRUCTOR: Ramy H

ff STUDENTS ENROLLED: 40 # STUDENT RESPONSES: 28 PERCENT OF STUDENTS RESPONDING: 70

LEGEND: S = Strongly Agree 4 ; Agree 3 Neutral 2 Disagree 1 � strongly Disagree 5 4 3 2 1 Miss N Mean StDev MON + + - + - + - + --- - + - + - + + - + Ql. Professor provided a syllabus that clearly described the goals, content, and requirements of the course. RESPONSES: 21 6 l 0 0 0 28 4.71 0.53 5 0.0 RESP: 75.0 21.4 3.6 0.0 Q2. Course materials and/or assigned text(s) and ideas related to the course. helped me understand concepts RESPONSES: 17 8 3 0 0 0 28 4.50 0.69 5 0.0 RESP: 60.7 28.6 10.7 0.0 Q3. Professor presented course material in a clear and organized fashion. RESPONSES: 16 9 3 0 0 0 28 4.46 0.69 RESP: 57.1 32.1 10.7 0.0 0.0 Q4. Professor responded effectively to questions. RESPONSES: 18 10 0 0 0 0 28 4.64 0.49 RESP: 64.3 35.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 QS. Professor promoted a respectful learning environment. RESPONSES: 18 8 1 0 0 1 27 4.63 0.56 RESP: 66.7 29.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 Q6. Professor promoted useful classroom d iscussions, as appropriate for the class. RESPONSES: 18 10 0 0 0 0 28 4.64 0.49 RESP: 64.3 35.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q7. Professor provided opportunities, either in or outside of class, for me to assess or gauge my understanding of the course material. 5 s 5 s RESPONSES: 17 8 2 0 0 1 27 4.56 0.64 5 RESP: 63.0 29.6 7.4 0.0 0.0 Q8. Professor helped make the course material interesting and/or relevant. RESPONSES: 14 12 2 0 0 0 28 4.43 0.63 4.5 RESP: 50.0 42.9 7.1 0.0 0.0 Q9. Professor was available outside of classroom to meet during regular office hours, by appointments, email, or phone calls. RESPONSES: 17 8 2 0 0 1 27 4.56 0.64 s RESP: 63.0 29.6 7.4 0.0 0.0 QlO. overall, this professor 15 an effective teacher. RESPONSES: 15 11 1 0 0 1 27 4.52 0.58 5 RESP: 55.6 40.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 Qll. Evaluate the amount of work assigned in this course 5 = far too little 4 :a too little 3 ,. just right 2-too much l = far too much RESPONSES: 3 2 14 2 5 2 26 2.85 1.19 3 RESP: 11.5 7.7 53.8 7.7 19.2 Ql2. Evaluate the level of all 4 not challenging challenging challenge that this course presented 5 - not at enough 3 � appropriately 2 � too challenging l � far too RESPONSES: 2 RESP: 7.4 2 7.4 18 4 1 66.7 14.8 3.7 Ql3. I attended all or nearly all class sessions. RESPONSES: 18 5 2 0 0 RESP: 72.0 20.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Q14. I came prepared for each class I attended. RESPONSES: 14 10 l 1 0 RESP: 53.8 38.5 3.8 3.8 0.0 l 27 3.00 0.83 3 25 4.64 0.64 2 26 4.42 0.76 QlS. I paid attention and was fully engaged 1n class. 3 5 5 RESPONSES: 11 11 3 l O 2 26 4.23 0.82 4 RESP: 42.3 42.3 11.5 3.8 0.0 Ql6. I sought additional help as needed. RESPONSES: 9 10 7 0 RESP: 34.6 38.5 26.9 0.0 0 0.0 2 26 4.08 0.80 4