Spring 2018 Course Evaluations

Giles, L

2009-CE TRIAL ADVOCACY

18/SL

Students Enrolled: 13

Student Responses: 7

53.85%

Legend: 5=Strongly Agree, 4=Agree, 3=Neutral, 2=Disagree, 1=Strongly Disagree

Q1. The professor provided a syllabus that clearly described the goals, content, and requirements of the course.

5

4

3

2

1

Total

Mean

Median

SD

Responses

7

0

0

0

0

7

5.00

5

0.00

%

100.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Q2. The course materials and/or assigned text(s) helped me understand concepts and ideas related to the course.

5

4

3

2

1

Total

Mean

Median

SD

Responses

6

1

0

0

0

7

4.86

5

0.35

%

85.71% 14.29%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Q3. The professor presented course material in a clear and organized fashion.

5

4

3

2

1

Total

Mean

Median

SD

Responses

5

2

0

0

0

7

4.71

4.5

0.45

%

71.43% 28.57%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Q4. The professor responded effectively to questions.

5

4

3

2

1

Total

Mean

Median

SD

Responses

3

2

1

0

0

6

4.33

4.5

0.75

%

50.00% 33.33% 16.67%

0.00%

0.00%

Q5. The professor promoted a respectful learning environment.

5

4

3

2

1

Total

Mean

Median

SD

Responses

4

3

0

0

0

7

4.57

5

0.49

%

57.14% 42.86%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Q6. The professor promoted useful classroom discussions, as appropriate for the class.

5

4

3

2

1

Total

Mean

Median

SD

Responses

3

3

0

0

0

6

4.50

4.5

0.50

%

50.00% 50.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Q7. The professor provided opportunities, either in or outside of class, for me to assess or gauge my understanding of the course material.

5

4

3

2

1

Total

Mean

Median

SD

Responses

5

2

0

0

0

7

4.71

5

0.45

%

71.43% 28.57%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Q8. The professor helped make the course material interesting and/or relevant.

5

4

3

2

1

Total

Mean

Median

SD

Responses

5

2

0

0

0

7

4.71

5

0.45

%

71.43% 28.57%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%